Will an AI disaster happen within a year? Anthropic and OpenAI privately simulate worst-case scenarios.

AI companies such as Anthropic and OpenAI are privately developing contingency plans for the eventuality of a major incident. Industry insiders worry that a major event could occur in the next 6 to 12 months, triggering public backlash and tightening regulations.

Author: Bu Shuqing, Wall Street Insights

The artificial intelligence industry is preparing for a major incident that could reshape the regulatory landscape.

According to a recent report by Axios,executives from companies such as Anthropic and OpenAI are privately speculating how American society and politics will react if AI causes serious real-world harm.

These simulations focus on extreme scenarios such as large-scale cyberattacks, including disruptions to financial services, internet connectivity, and even power and water supply systems. Industry insiders worry that in the event of a major incident caused by insecure AI, the already cautious public may further turn against the technology, and AI companies and their executives will face even greater public pressure.

The report states thatmany AI industry insiders believe a major event may occur within the next 6 to 12 months.As a result, corporate executives have begun communicating with US congressmen in advance, hoping to influence relevant laws and policies formulated by the US government should a crisis actually occur.

AI companies are concerned that a major accident could trigger a public backlash.

According to Axios, AI companies are assessing the potential political and social reactions following a major incident. Possible scenarios include an out-of-control swarm of AI agents breaching internal testing environments, or malicious actors exploiting existing models to launch attacks.

Businesses worry that if AI causes significant real-world harm for the first time, the public, who were already cautious about the technology, may turn further against it.

Industry leaders such as Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, as well as US President Trump, who has been criticized for his reluctance to strengthen AI regulation, may face greater public pressure.

Businesses should communicate in advance to prepare for post-accident supervision.

According to reports, AI companies are conducting red team tests to simulate worst-case scenarios, while simultaneously accelerating the dissemination of AI-related knowledge to members of the U.S. Congress.

Corporate executives believe that current conditions for pushing for regulatory legislation are limited, but a major incident could change the direction of policy discussions. Therefore, they hope to participate in relevant discussions in advance and influence the laws and policies that the US government may enact at that time.

Some Democrats have proposed banning superintelligence or suspending the development of advanced AI. Other proposals have garnered bipartisan support and even some industry figures, such as requiring advanced AI systems to have emergency shutdown switches. However, experts also question the practical feasibility of completely shutting down all AI systems.

At the same time, a large number of open weighted models are available for free download and use, increasing the complexity of risk governance.Many cybersecurity professionals believe that leveraging AI to combat malicious AI is one way to address this issue.

Tightening regulations face real constraints.

Even if a major AI incident triggers a strong backlash, the US government may face multiple constraints in formulating response policies.

AI infrastructure development is deeply intertwined with the global economy. Slowing down this development could impact an already fragile economy. This means that governments must consider the associated economic consequences when deciding to strengthen AI regulation.

Political divisions are also a concern for businesses. Some AI industry insiders predict that the Democratic Party may push for stricter AI restrictions after the midterm elections, but even if the Democrats control both the House and the Senate, internal party divisions could still affect policy implementation.

Axios, citing a Democratic aide, suggests that in a true crisis, the two parties in Washington might temporarily set aside their differences. Experiences of cooperation during the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 financial crisis are seen as a possible reference point.

Currently, it remains uncertain whether a major AI incident will occur within the next 6 to 12 months. What is certain is that companies such as Anthropic and OpenAI have begun to simulate policy scenarios following such incidents and are attempting to participate in relevant regulatory discussions in advance.

Source:Global Cybersecurity Alliance (GCSA)
Website:www.gcsa.org